| I don't see anything wrong with "send" doing the work. It's the only logical | place for it, and in my opinion, is really no different than having it expand | aliases and such. What if you build a draft, don't send it, and then delete the /tmp/foo.jpg that you had attached? When you send it tomorrow, that's too late to get the file. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Jon Steinhart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine |
| Previous by Thread: | Forwarded messages attachment headers (was Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?), Joel Reicher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?, Joel Reicher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |