On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:14:53 +0700, Robert Elz said:
Really? How do you propose making that work? Look at the From: header of this message
One wonders how many MUAs out there choke at that. Does Outlook/Exchange manage to cope with that?
Please read the mail standards before proposing changing the way MH works, don't rely on e-mail being just what you commonly see, or what other e-mail clients permit (many of which have similarly been created by people who have no idea what e-mail is supposed to permit.)
There's all sorts of neat stuff allowed by the RFCs. Unfortunately, my actual use of said features is in practical terms restricted to those things that don't make our Exchange admin come looking for me if I accidentally use the feature when I send my boss e-mail... Which brings up a question - is it sane to try to support per-destination customization? I can probably do the things I'd want in replcomps and friends, *if* there was a way to say "emit this header for matches in 'to' for this pattern, but emit this other header for non-match recipients". Unfortunately, that would require send/post to grow the ability to send multiple SMTP envelopes with differing headers. Ouch.
pgpI0CUF3ZZKI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings & spost, Valdis . Kletnieks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings & spost, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings & spost, Valdis . Kletnieks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings & spost, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |