Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits.

david wrote:
> Paul F. wrote:
>
> > as for the rest of mh -- it's certainly possible to hit the MAXARGS
> > limit with other commands (show, for instance), but i suspect the
> > frequency is much lower, and those, too, can be fixed as needed.
>
> I'd vote for nuking these, as well:
>
>   uip/forw.c:         if (mp->numsel >= MAXARGS - i)
>   uip/mshcmds.c:      if (mp->numsel > MAXARGS - 1) {
>   uip/show.c:    if (mp->numsel > MAXARGS - 2)

i'll take a look, and take a stab at them.  they'll need more
careful review.

paul

> The msh one is for its rmm.
>
> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

=---------------------
 paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma, 
where it's 28.9 degrees)

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers