Paul F. wrote:
(one way to reduce the likelihood of this, and of the original
overflow issue, might be to pass the message arguments to rmmproc in
the same form that they were received by refile. currently "refile
all" causes a call to rmmproc with a full enumeration of message
numbers. if "refile all" instead caused "rmmproc all", on the
assumption that the same expansion would result, then the original
invocation of refile would be as likely to fail as rmmproc. there are
probably subtleties to this i'm not getting right now.)
I think this should work. rmmproc could call "pick <args>"
to get the same expansion.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers