Paul F. wrote:
david wrote:
> Paul F. wrote:
>
> > as for the rest of mh -- it's certainly possible to hit the MAXARGS
> > limit with other commands (show, for instance), but i suspect the
> > frequency is much lower, and those, too, can be fixed as needed.
>
> I'd vote for nuking these, as well:
>
> uip/forw.c: if (mp->numsel >= MAXARGS - i)
> uip/mshcmds.c: if (mp->numsel > MAXARGS - 1) {
> uip/show.c: if (mp->numsel > MAXARGS - 2)
i'll take a look, and take a stab at them. they'll need more
careful review.
All of them load a statically sized array, so it would have
to be changed to dynamically allocated. Maybe it's not
worth the trouble. There'd be an inconsistency between
msh's rmm and the standalone, but I don't think we need to
invest any effort in maintaining msh.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers