Ralph wrote:
I know, that's why I showed what header was failing, in
this case `resent-date' rather than plain old `date'. :-)
Or is the `date field' not hard-coded and actually showing
the datefield was `date' in this case?
Yes:
admonish (NULL, "can't parse %s field in message %d", datesw, msg);
where datesw contains the name of the field, either provided
with -datefield or defaulting to "date".
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers