david wrote:
Ralph wrote:
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, using file mod time,
continu
ing...
"sortm: 66: resent-date not understood; will use mtime"
"continuing..." seems superfluous.
OK, but I think that we should keep the original beginning, so:
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, will use file mtime
The user can select the field to use for the date with
-datefield. And I'd like to be clear about what the 66, in
this case, refers to. And that's consistent with other nmh
warnings.
not all MH users are programmers. i like "file modication time" better
than "mtime".
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma,
where it's 18.9 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers