Hi David,
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, using file mod time,
continuing...
"sortm: 66: resent-date not understood; will use mtime"
"continuing..." seems superfluous.
OK, but I think that we should keep the original beginning, so:
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, will use file mtime
The user can select the field to use for the date with -datefield.
I know, that's why I showed what header was failing, in this case
`resent-date' rather than plain old `date'. :-) Or is the `date field'
not hard-coded and actually showing the datefield was `date' in this
case?
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers