Ralph wrote:
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, using file mod time, continu
ing...
"sortm: 66: resent-date not understood; will use mtime"
"continuing..." seems superfluous.
OK, but I think that we should keep the original beginning, so:
sortm: can't parse date field in message 66, will use file mtime
The user can select the field to use for the date with
-datefield. And I'd like to be clear about what the 66, in
this case, refers to. And that's consistent with other nmh
warnings.
David
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers