Ken wrote:
[Earl:] I do not recommend blanket 2047 decoding for parameter data. Just limit it to parameters associated with a filename.I find this argument convicing; thoughts from others?
That's what I implemented in mhfixmsg: just Content-Type name and Content-Disposition filename. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters, Ken Hornstein |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |