Hi again Ken,
What did you write? I'm guessing the perfectly valid `nmh-announce: ;'?
I've triggered it myself at pair.com. An empty group address isn't sufficient; it needs to be followed by another address. Still perfectly valid under RFC 2822. Tx'd: To: group-name: ;, ralph@example.com Rx'd: To: group-name: ;, ""@ruis.pair.com, ralph@example.com I'll tell them. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, norm |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |