Hi again Ken,
What did you write? I'm guessing the perfectly valid `nmh-announce: ;'?
I've triggered it myself at pair.com. An empty group address isn't
sufficient; it needs to be followed by another address. Still
perfectly valid under RFC 2822.
Tx'd: To: group-name: ;, ralph@example.com
Rx'd: To: group-name: ;, ""@ruis.pair.com, ralph@example.com
I'll tell them.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
--
Nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, norm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the release of nmh-1.7, Ralph Corderoy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |