Ken Hornstein <kenh@pobox.com> wrote:
> - It is not clear to me that you can state with certainly that the
> 250 response code will contain the queue identifier (that is, in
> fact, not a concept that appears anywhere that I can find in the SMTP
> RFCs). As a practical matter I've never had to give anyone the queue
> identifier of a message (because it's not normally logged on the
I have both asked for it and provided it when debugging bizarre situations.
Could we log the entire result, and let the post hook take care of the
various queue formats?
> I am neutral about this being made to work with sendmail/pipe; it would
> actually be a lot of work to do that. We could just accept that it is
> one more thing that doesn't work with sendmail/pipe.
slowly, that interface is dying. I have mixed feelings about that.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers