john doe wrote in <fa19c149-80c1-52ca-f007-a450f10b03aa(_at_)mail(_dot_)com>:
|Hello all, and thank you for your answers.
|
|On 1/8/2020 3:07 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
|> Hi John,
|>
|>> As far as I understand it, NMH can not be used directly with IMAP,so I
|>> would like to use FDM for this.
|>
|> For those of us that didn't know, or have forgotten, FDM is a
|> fetchmail(1)-alike. https://github.com/nicm/fdm#readme
|
|Is there any alternative to fdm for imap that works well with NMH?
What do you mean by that? My MUA inherited IMAP support from its
predecessor Heirloom mailx (now S-nail for some more time), it is
primitive but usable. Error handling and recovery of that entire
"module" is primitive / non-existing, i.e., for superior
scriptable access. But beside that it is a basic yet functional
IMAP implementation.
(It actually has even some neat ideas, like a local IMAP cache.
But these will vanish in the future.)
|>> John Doe
|>
|
|Are you refering to the signature?
|
|> You may be interested to know that the mailing list got a few, not many,
|> bounces from subscribers because they thought your email was spam;
|> I suspect it was the moniker that triggered them, though things like the
|> all-CAPS subject raised the score here.
|>
|
|At the time I created this e-mail address, I thought that using "john
|doe" was a good idea, now that I'm using this e-mail more and more, it
|became apparent that I neglected spam filtering! :)
|
|Sorry about that.
|
|P.S.
|
|Duly noted for not capitalizing subject anymore.
|
--End of <fa19c149-80c1-52ca-f007-a450f10b03aa(_at_)mail(_dot_)com>
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)