Re: Official "Junk" status

procmail

Re: Official "Junk" status

1997-08-07 16:50:00

On Aug 7,  6:32pm -0400, Timothy J Luoma <luomat(_at_)peak(_dot_)org> wrote:

ALSO: pick something more specific than 'junk'  -- like 'junk-spam' or  
'spam-junk' because 'junk' is used for other stuff (such as auto-responders)  
that is more valid than spam.


You can't just create a random precedence.  Sendmail only recognizes a
few precedences, as specified in sendmail.cf.

E.g., the machine I'm on right now only shows

    Pfirst-class=0
    Pspecial-delivery=100
    Pjunk=-100

== Bob

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Official "Junk" status, (continued) Re: Official "Junk" status, David W. Tamkin Re: Official "Junk" status, Network Admin Re: Official "Junk" status, David W. Tamkin Re: Official "Junk" status, Network Admin Re: Official "Junk" status, era eriksson Re: Official "Junk" status, J. Daniel Smith Re: Official "Junk" status, Wotan Re: Official "Junk" status, Ian Southam Re: Official "Junk" status, era eriksson Re: Official "Junk" status, Timothy J Luoma Re: Official "Junk" status, Bob Weissman <= Re: Official "Junk" status, Michael Stone

Previous by Date:	Re: how to modify the body?, Philip Guenther
Next by Date:	Re: Procmail difficulty in using "raw" mode, Michael Stone
Previous by Thread:	Re: Official "Junk" status, Timothy J Luoma
Next by Thread:	Re: Official "Junk" status, Michael Stone
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]