Re: catching x-Advert headers


How is Pegasus better suited for spamming?   /:b

--

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:

And the spammers will have caused more problems, in ruining the reputation  
of a nice freeware app.


and their motive may be that the author of Pegasus issued the obviously
unenforceable decree that it may not be used for spamming.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: possible problem in Message ID filter., (continued) Re: possible problem in Message ID filter., R Lindberg / E Winnie Message not available Re: possible problem in Message ID filter., Professional Software Engineering Re: possible problem in Message ID filter., Ed McGuire Re: Another possible problem with the From/To match, J. Daniel Smith Re: catching x-Advert headers, J. Daniel Smith Re: catching x-Advert headers, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 Re: catching x-Advert headers, Matthew G. Saroff (Do not Reply to this Address) Filter Order in Procmailrc, Bryan Farrish Re: Filter Order in Procmailrc, Chris D. Halverson Re: Filter Order in Procmailrc, Philip Guenther Re: catching x-Advert headers, { brad brace } <= Re: catching x-Advert headers, Matt Garretson Re: catching x-Advert headers, Ralph Sims Re: catching x-Advert headers, W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Previous by Date:	Re: Where is a procmail mailing list archive?, era eriksson
Next by Date:	Re: Smartlist and Procmail List Spam, Matthew G. Saroff (Do not Reply to this Address)
Previous by Thread:	Re: Filter Order in Procmailrc, Philip Guenther
Next by Thread:	Re: catching x-Advert headers, Matt Garretson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]