On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, era eriksson wrote:
Whoops, that was a tangled explanation. How about this example
instead:
# Subsequent scans will operate on a copy with attachments removed
:0Fwb
| remove-all-attachments
# Calculate scores on copy without attacments
:0B
* -5^0
* 1^1 \!!!
output
# Actually writes out the message the way it was before
# the F recipe
Comments?
That would certainly be more flexible then simply ignoring the encoded
portions of the body.
I think you'd want to be more explicit about the context switching,
though.
So there would be four possible modes:
1) match original message, process/deliver original message
2) match forked message, process/deliver original message
3) match original message, process/deliver forked message
4) match forked message, process/deliver forked message
Plus "fork original message", "replace original message with forked
message", and "discard forked message" commands/options.
Yet more comments?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now? [ OK ]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
96 days until Daylight Savings Time ends