On Tue, 21 Jul 1998 14:30:16 +0300 (EET DST),
era eriksson <era(_at_)iki(_dot_)fi> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 1998 16:52:35 -0700 (PDT), "John D. Hardin"
<jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com> wrote:
Does this capability currently exist? If not, is it planned? Does anybody
have any arguments against implementing this restriction on body
processing?
I think I would basically generate a second message with the
attachments excluded and see what score I get on that. Probably too
messy to do in practice.
Actually, it would be nice if there was an alternative to the :f
switch saying, make a copy of the message, and do the following
filtering on the in-memory copy used for matching, but output the
original, unadultered copy when eventually delivering a message.
Whoops, that was a tangled explanation. How about this example
instead:
# Subsequent scans will operate on a copy with attachments removed
:0Fwb
| remove-all-attachments
# Calculate scores on copy without attacments
:0B
* -5^0
* 1^1 \!!!
output
# Actually writes out the message the way it was before
# the F recipe
Comments?
/* era */
--
Paparazzi of the Net: No matter what you do to protect your privacy,
they'll hunt you down and spam you. <http://www.iki.fi/~era/spam/>