| That's because that is what _I_ had already suggested.
Oh! Thanks for straightening that out, Sean, and I apologize to you for
crediting the wrong person.
| His recipe was at
| the bottom of his message - and treated the filtering program as a
| pass/fail test, not as a transformation:
|
| >:0
| >* some condition
| >{
| > :0 B
| > * ? yourscript
| > someaction
| >}
Even if that were the right procedure, it could be written
:0
* some condition
* B ?? ? yourscript
someaction
which is quicker for procmail to read and IMO more legible for human eyes as
well.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail