procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: would this work in a recipe?

2002-05-02 13:28:53
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Pantelis Hadzipantelis wrote:

On another note, why use ^Content-Type?

He's looking in the top-level message header for Content-Type to avoid
scanning the bodies of non-multipart mail for possible attachments.  It's
an optimization.

But in Content-Disposition you do get a filename extension...

Content-Type can contain a name= parameter as well; it's not standard, but 
a few MUAs use/recognize it.

On Thu, 2 May 2002, John D. Hardin wrote:

On Thu, 2 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:

* -1^1 ^Content-Disposition:.*\.(doc|xls)

That fails on multiline MIME headers.

Right, I was thinking of the top-level header where procmail does the 
unfolding for you.  This should be better:

* -1^1 ^Content-Disposition:(.|^[       ])*\.(doc|xls)

(space and tab in the [] as usual).

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>