procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: would this work in a recipe?

2002-05-02 18:53:34
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Professional Software Engineering wrote:

Because attachment filenames may be represented in muliple forms:

         name = "somefilename.ext";
         name=somefilename.ext;
         name=somefilename.ext
         name="somefilename.ext";
         name="somefilename.ext"
         name = "somefilename.ext"

(not to mention filename= vs name=, etc).

and consciously malicious use of newlines. This is valid:

     Content-type:
        fnord/fnord
        ;
        name
        =
        "attack.exe"
        ;

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin(_at_)impsec(_dot_)org                       pgpk -a 
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "They [media giants] have no idea how to do business with resourceful
  human beings rather than passive vegetables. So they run to [the]
  government for protection."
                    -- Doc Searls on the SSSCA, in Linux Journal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   915 days until the Presidential Election

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>