Procmail (date)
May 31, 2002
- Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 09:31
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 08:54
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, David W. Tamkin, 08:35
- Autoreply to Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility (fwd), Udi Mottelo, 07:49
- Re: HELP, Udi Mottelo, 07:17
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 06:55
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Udi Mottelo, 06:46
- Re: newline, Udi Mottelo, 06:20
- Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 04:35
- Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 04:10
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:13
- Waiting until action finish, Marek Wysmulek, 03:05
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 03:03
- Re: mail for all.., Nancy McGough, 00:00
May 30, 2002
- Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, Andrew Edelstein, 23:12
- Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 21:31
- ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 21:31
- Re: matching "p5-" w/ \<(perl5|p5-)\>, David W. Tamkin, 11:14
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed - progress made, Pollywog, 11:08
- Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 10:55
- matching "p5-" w/ \<(perl5|p5-)\>, parv, 10:54
- Re:mail for all.., Charlie Summers, 09:24
- Re: Blocking e-mails with attachements, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:53
- mail for all.., johnathan spectre, 08:38
- newline, alois blasbichler, 08:29
- (no subject), alois . blasbichler, 08:04
- Re: Blocking e-mails with attachements, Timothy J. Luoma, 07:59
- Procmail with crontab, prajakti, 07:43
- Blocking e-mails with attachements, Jean-Rene Cormier, 07:42
- HELP, Everaldo, 07:42
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 07:27
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 06:19
- Re: Procmail & Crontab, David W. Tamkin, 05:14
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, David W. Tamkin, 05:12
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Nancy McGough, 04:23
- Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Udi Mottelo, 04:04
- Re: Procmail & Crontab, Olivier Nicole, 03:56
- Procmail & Crontab, prajakti, 03:46
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 02:10
- Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Nancy McGough, 02:06
- Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 01:31
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Nancy McGough, 01:12
May 29, 2002
- Re: Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 21:39
- Re: Variables in conditions, David W. Tamkin, 19:16
- Re: Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 18:54
- Re: Variables in conditions, Andrew Edelstein, 18:26
- Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 18:00
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 17:14
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Andrew Edelstein, 17:03
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 15:33
- Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Andrew Edelstein, 15:20
- Re: forward to a new email address, Andrew Edelstein, 15:17
- IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 14:55
- forward to a new email address, John Lyons, 13:47
- Re: Blocking email with attachments, Ron Johnson, 13:26
- Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Alan Clifford, 12:12
- Re: Blocking email with attachments, Matt Wills, 11:50
- Re: multi-line matching, David W. Tamkin, 11:09
- Re: Blocking email with attachments, Ron Johnson, 10:08
- Blocking email with attachments, Jean-Rene Cormier, 09:15
- Re: procmail invoking sendmail, Professional Software Engineering, 09:13
- multi-line matching, mlists, 09:06
- Forward a message and alter the subject, Caran, Julien, 08:45
- Re: How to OR conditions, David W. Tamkin, 08:02
- Re: How to OR conditions, Bart Schaefer, 07:53
- procmail invoking sendmail, Steve Heitke, 07:34
- How to OR conditions, Olivier Nicole, 02:43
May 28, 2002
- Re: whole word recipe, erik, 23:59
- Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 23:57
- Re: Procmail grammar problem, Andrew Edelstein, 23:20
- Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 22:19
- Re: Procmail gramma problem, David W. Tamkin, 20:29
- Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 19:39
- Re: Procmail gramma problem, David W. Tamkin, 18:30
- Re: whole word recipe, Andrew Edelstein, 17:58
- Re: whole word recipe, Philip Guenther, 17:12
- Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 16:19
- Re: whole word recipe, Andrew Edelstein, 16:05
- Re: Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Andrew Edelstein, 16:01
- Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 15:58
- Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 13:40
- Re: Procmail grammar problem, David W. Tamkin, 12:39
- Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 12:25
- Re: whole word recipe, Udi Mottelo, 12:23
- Re: whole word recipe, S Semple, 12:03
- Re: Procmail grammar problem, Marek Wysmulek, 12:01
- Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 11:59
- Re: Procmail grammar problem, David W. Tamkin, 10:36
- Procmail gramma problem, Marek Wysmulek, 10:10
- Re: Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Professional Software Engineering, 09:50
- Procmail gramma problem, Marek Wysmulek, 09:09
- Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 09:08
- Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 09:01
- Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 08:50
- Ajuda - Procmail -» Formail , Everaldo, 08:13
- Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Alonso, Claudio Fabian, 08:12
- Re: 2 continuous lines match, Anatoly Pugachev, 07:57
- Re: 2 continuous lines match, Udi Mottelo, 07:53
- Re: 2 continuous lines match, Martin McCarthy, 07:18
- Re: Newbie: Logging, Udi Mottelo, 07:14
- 2 continuous lines match, Anatoly Pugachev, 07:01
- Re: whole word recipe, Udi Mottelo, 06:57
- Newbie: Logging, Matt Wills, 06:30
May 27, 2002
- Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 23:10
- Re: whole word recipe, David W. Tamkin, 19:59
- Re: whole word recipe, S Semple, 19:11
- Re: whole word recipe, Martin McCarthy, 11:36
- how i can run procmail with sendmail as a LDA and how can i limit mail box size, Mujeeb, 03:08
- Re: Postfix + Procmail filter, Nancy McGough, 02:51
- how i can run procmail with sendmail as a LDA and how can i limit mail box size, Mujeeb, 00:34
May 24, 2002
- Re: spamming myself?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:25
- Re: spamming myself?, David W. Tamkin, 18:44
- Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 15:59
- Question,, RiverNet Support, 13:27
- Command Line Args, James Raney, 11:29
- Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 10:01
- Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 09:18
- Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 08:07
- Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 07:44
- Re: Sending emails with attachments, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:24
- Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 06:50
- Re: spamming myself?, Don Hammond, 06:31
- Re: Variable not working for two words, Don Hammond, 06:28
- How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 06:24
- Re: Catching possible Viral content, Martin McCarthy, 05:38
- Re: Odd temporary file created by procmail., Santiago Vila, 02:52
- Re: Postfix + Procmail filter, Udi Mottelo, 02:27
- RE: Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 02:09
- Postfix + Procmail filter, Franck PAULUS, 01:33
- Re: processing email that bounces, Paul Thomas, 00:43
May 23, 2002
- Re: processing email that bounces, David W. Tamkin, 22:03
- Re: recipe query, Troy Rasiah, 21:15
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 21:05
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 20:00
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 19:41
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 18:39
- Re: recipe query, Professional Software Engineering, 18:33
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 18:02
- recipe query, Troy Rasiah, 17:56
- Odd temporary file created by procmail., Hans Deragon (imap), 15:39
- Re: Sending emails with attachments, Udi Mottelo, 13:37
- RE: Sending emails with attachments, Professional Software Engineering, 13:29
- Re: Catching possible Viral content, Professional Software Engineering, 13:23
- Re: .forward and procmail, Fred Morris, 13:14
- Re: Catching possible Viral content, John D. Hardin, 13:07
- Re: Catching possible Viral content, John Conover, 13:01
- Re: Catching possible Viral content, Bart Schaefer, 12:49
- RE: Sending emails with attachments, Charlie Summers, 12:38
- Catching possible Viral content, mike, 12:30
- Re: .forward and procmail, Udi Mottelo, 12:19
- Re: Sending emails with attachments, Mark, 11:58
- RE: Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 11:47
- Re: .forward and procmail, David W. Tamkin, 11:39
- Re: .forward and procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 11:26
- Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 10:37
- Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 10:31
- .forward and procmail, Stephen R. Wilcoxon, 10:25
- Re: spamming myself?, Udi Mottelo, 09:57
- Variable not working for two words, S Semple, 09:08
- Re: spamming myself?, Bart Schaefer, 08:44
- Re: spamming myself?, Don Hammond, 07:10
- spamming myself?, Timothy J. Luoma, 05:53
- Re: Sendmail now invokes Procmail, ProcMailER, 05:24
May 22, 2002
- Re: Sendmail now invokes Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 23:20
- Sendmail now invokes Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 21:19
- (No Subject), S Semple, 19:25
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 19:09
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 17:24
- global procmailrc not being read, Chris LaFrance, 13:21
- Re: setting "mail from;", Andrew Edelstein, 09:13
- Re: setting "mail from;", Peter Rose, 08:25
- Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Bart Schaefer, 07:51
- Odd behavior on Sendmail and Procmail, Scott Palmer, 07:42
- 3.22 drops 'F' in From_ when rescuing unfiltered data, Mark Bynum, 07:11
- Re: setting "mail from;", David W. Tamkin, 06:46
- Re: setting "mail from;", Bill Moseley, 06:12
- Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 03:18
- Re: No way procmail rc file seems to live., Professional Software Engineering, 02:28
- Re: Sendmail is not invoking Procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 02:18
- Re: Stuck Procmail processes, Professional Software Engineering, 02:11
- Re: help with procmail receipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 02:02
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 01:55
- help with procmail receipe..., Richie Lai, 00:26
- Stuck Procmail processes, Monte Smith, 00:18
- No way procmail rc file seems to live., sjaak nabuurs, 00:10
May 21, 2002
- Sendmail is not invoking Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 23:26
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 22:46
- Re: setting "mail from;", Professional Software Engineering, 21:25
- Re: setting "mail from;", Andrew Edelstein, 21:15
- Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 21:11
- setting "mail from;", Bill Moseley, 20:34
- Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 20:30
- Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 19:48
- Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 18:09
- Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 14:31
- processing emails that bounce., Teddy Campbell, 13:20
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 11:04
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 09:44
- Re: procmail dead ??, Professional Software Engineering, 09:38
May 20, 2002
- procmail dead ??, sjaak nabuurs, 19:47
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 17:09
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 12:21
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 11:41
- Re: I need help configuring procmail, procmail-list, 11:38
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 10:54
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Eric Hilding, 10:20
- trusted user, Gustavo Schroeder, 06:02
- Re: properly process email for multiple accounts, Philip Guenther, 02:32
- Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Philip Guenther, 02:27
- Re: I need help configuring procmail, Philip Guenther, 02:22
- Re: recompile procmail for exim?, Philip Guenther, 02:18
- Re: grep addresses from flat file, Philip Guenther, 02:14
- Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Harold Hallikainen, 01:32
May 19, 2002
- Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Professional Software Engineering, 21:59
- Spambouncer status, Matthew G. Saroff, 18:30
- Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Peter A. J. Pilgrim, 18:02
- properly process email for multiple accounts, SI Reasoning, 12:48
- well my filter works, so I guess I won.., Fred Morris, 12:06
- You Won $30 Dollars !, procmail, 11:48
- Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Professional Software Engineering, 11:29
- Mozilla and Spambouncer, Peter A. J. Pilgrim, 08:04
- Re: grep addresses from flat file, John Gianni, 04:56
- New Cygwin Package: procmail-3.22-6, Jason Tishler, 04:53
- I need help configuring procmail, Justin Rickert, 04:40
- using procmail with Netscape Messaging, Kevin Knubel, 04:35
- Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Eric Hilding, 00:04
May 16, 2002
- Re: Forging Return-Path (was: Re: Vintage Charlie....), Bart Schaefer, 22:37
- Forging Return-Path (was: Re: Vintage Charlie....), John Hardin, 20:23
- Re: whitelist, Alan Clifford, 18:43
- Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Alan Clifford, 18:07
- Re: whitelist, Professional Software Engineering, 17:52
- If that's vintage Charlie, 2002 ha a fine crop., David W. Tamkin, 16:27
- Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:46
- recompile procmail for exim?, Dave Robbins, 15:34
- Re:Vintage Charlie...., Charlie Summers, 14:32
- Re: Vintage Charlie...., Paul Thomas, 14:23
- Re: Vintage Charlie...., Philip Guenther, 13:44
- Vintage Charlie...., Paul Thomas, 13:33
- Re: whitelist, Alan Clifford, 13:31
- FORWARDING EMAILS!!!!!!!, jonas da coll, 08:18
- procmail LDA - adding >From, Jon Nathan, 07:47
May 15, 2002
- Re: whitelist, Paul Rodger, 20:54
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), erik, 20:32
- Re: whitelist, Professional Software Engineering, 20:22
- whitelist, Chuck Charlton, 19:47
- Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:37
- Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 10:05
- Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Poohba, 09:35
- Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 09:28
- Revised: Re: Is this right?, Poohba, 08:19
- Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 07:59
- Is this right?, Poohba, 07:23
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), David W. Tamkin, 06:55
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), Udi Mottelo, 03:01
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:11
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), erik, 01:47
- Apology (was: Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received), Andrew Edelstein, 01:11
May 14, 2002
- procmail LDA - adding >From, Jon Nathan, 20:54
- Re: recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 11:30
- Re: ^TO_ is to clever, SI Reasoning, 09:42
- Re: ^TO_ is to clever, Professional Software Engineering, 09:34
- Re: ^TO_ is too clever, David W. Tamkin, 09:15
- Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 08:18
- ^TO_ is to clever, Christian H. Kuhn, 08:05
- Re: [procmail] simple recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:48
- Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), David W. Tamkin, 06:39
- Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 06:21
- A tip (was: Reversing text?), Udi Mottelo, 03:32
- Re: simple recipe, erik, 02:13
May 13, 2002
- Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 20:52
- Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Andrew Edelstein, 19:01
- simple recipe, Chris LaFrance, 16:54
- Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, David W. Tamkin, 16:27
- Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, David W. Tamkin, 16:27
- Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Professional Software Engineering, 14:48
- Re: recipes just not working, Professional Software Engineering, 14:42
- formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 13:41
- Re: recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 13:23
- How can I make a copy of every outgoing message?, Mac Table, 13:04
- Re: recipes just not working, Professional Software Engineering, 12:46
- recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 12:38
- filestruktur?, jonas da coll, 11:35
- Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 06:06
- RE: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Edward Wildgoose, 05:36
- Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 05:12
- RE: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Edward Wildgoose, 04:54
May 12, 2002
- Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Andrew Edelstein, 21:23
- Re: Reversing text?, Andrew Edelstein, 19:40
- Re: Reversing text?, David W. Tamkin, 17:59
- Re: Reversing text?, Udi Mottelo, 16:02
- Improve the man pages (was: Stupid question about :0:), Udi Mottelo, 14:05
- reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 12:09
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Jim Bailey, 10:25
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Andrew Edelstein, 08:24
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, parv, 06:39
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, David W. Tamkin, 04:49
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 03:06
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Per Sandstrom, 01:24
May 11, 2002
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Marco Fioretti, 23:44
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 16:01
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Andrew Edelstein, 15:24
- Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 13:36
- About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Marco Fioretti, 12:29
- Re: Changing my system mailbox, Martin McCarthy, 05:21
- Changing my system mailbox, Ryan Lindsey, 00:16
May 10, 2002
- Re: Change where Procmail as LDA delivers mail, Philip Guenther, 22:55
- Change where Procmail as LDA delivers mail, John Oliver, 15:29
- Re: Modify To: field when forwarding email, Professional Software Engineering, 14:04
- replacing majordomo, is it possible?, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés, 09:25
- Re: [procmail] Filter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:59
- Re: Modify To: field when forwarding email, Giles Constant, 08:07
- Modify To: field when forwarding email, Jean-Rene Cormier, 07:59
- Re: Filter, Harry Putnam, 07:35
- Filter, Monah Baki, 06:57
- Re: How do I relay from within procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 03:43
- Using Procmail to replace of Outlook's message rule, Mac Table, 03:04
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 02:00
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 01:54
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 01:51
- Re: How do I relay from within procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 01:25
- Novice needs help setting up spam bouncer, Don Phillipe, 01:22
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 01:06
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 00:58
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 00:52
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 00:45
- How do I relay from within procmail?, SI Reasoning, 00:30
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 00:28
May 09, 2002
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 17:09
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 16:43
- Re: Stupid question about :0: (aka Coffee Logic), GreenTree Ground Station, 16:19
- Re: Sanitizer setup question, Professional Software Engineering, 14:31
- Re: Reversing text?, Martin McCarthy, 14:29
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 14:24
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 14:22
- Sanitizer setup question, chris, 13:37
- Re: Reversing text?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:54
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Alan Clifford, 12:38
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Professional Software Engineering, 12:29
- Reversing text?, David Gibbs, 12:26
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 11:53
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, David W. Tamkin, 11:34
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 11:18
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:57
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Matt Thoene, 09:10
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 08:43
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 08:32
- Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, David W. Tamkin, 08:23
- extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 07:22
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Nancy McGough, 06:08
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Udi Mottelo, 05:14
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Nancy McGough, 03:47
- Re: Stupid question about :0:, Professional Software Engineering, 03:12
- Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 01:56
May 08, 2002
- [OT] teste, Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz, 14:49
- Re: Filtering, Professional Software Engineering, 13:21
- Re: Filtering, Andrew Edelstein, 12:14
- Filtering, Eric Bessette, 10:57
- Re: Excessive output quenched [was: (no subject)], Don Hammond, 09:52
May 07, 2002
- Re: Handling multi-line To:, Don Hammond, 09:06
- Re: a problem regarding procmailrc, Don Hammond, 08:53
- Handling multi-line To:, Stephen Patterson, 06:23
- a problem regarding procmailrc, Ali, Imran, 04:19
- question., Ali, Imran, 04:05
- Support Request, ma, 04:03
- (no subject), prakash, 04:01
May 06, 2002
- Re: corrupted mboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 18:11
- problems with -Y, Chris Kantarjiev, 17:29
- success was: corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 17:01
- Re: corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 16:44
- Re: corrupted mboxes, Philip Guenther, 16:40
- Re: corrupted mboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 15:56
- corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 15:16
- Re: sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory, Professional Software Engineering, 12:25
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:25
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Udi Mottelo, 11:14
- Re: Using a list of known good senders, Alan Clifford, 09:25
- Re: no "Lines" in mbox, David W. Tamkin, 08:26
- Using a list of known good senders, Chuck Charlton, 08:23
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Matt Garretson, 07:14
- sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory, Ralph SOBEK, 07:05
- Re: Does this recipe look right?, Shane Williams, 05:46
- Re: no "Lines" in mbox, Axel Heinrici, 04:55
- Re: no "Lines" in mbox, Christer Borang, 03:07
- no "Lines" in mbox, Axel Heinrici, 02:44
May 05, 2002
- Re: Split the folder and spread to the users, Professional Software Engineering, 14:09
- Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 14:09
- Re: About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 13:00
- Split the folder and spread to the users, Udi Mottelo, 12:22
- Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 11:26
- Re: Does this recipe look right?, Udi Mottelo, 04:11
- Re: Does this recipe look right?, Udi Mottelo, 03:11
- Re: About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 03:06
- Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 02:12
- About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 01:54
- Re: Procmail Problems, Andrew Edelstein, 00:31
May 03, 2002
- Does this recipe look right?, Shane Williams, 16:06
- Re: How to change LOG verbosity?, David W. Tamkin, 12:49
- Re: How to change LOG verbosity? (was: procmail flaky??), Professional Software Engineering, 11:55
- Re: multi action and spamassassin, spamreg, 10:53
- How to change LOG verbosity? (was: procmail flaky??), Edward Huang, 10:52
- Re: multi action and spamassassin, Professional Software Engineering, 10:35
- Re: could this message be bypassing procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 09:43
- Re: complicated forward, Professional Software Engineering, 09:41
- multi action and spamassassin, spamreg, 09:32
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 09:03
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 09:02
- complicated forward, Pavel Krijewkij, 07:27
- RE: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Geoff Mulligan, 07:26
- could this message be bypassing procmail?, hans anderson, 07:25
- Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Fabien Penso, 00:55
May 02, 2002
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, parv, 20:55
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, David W. Tamkin, 19:58
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, Andrew Edelstein, 19:41
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, David W. Tamkin, 19:28
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 19:01
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, John D. Hardin, 18:53
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 17:47
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 16:41
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 15:53
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:52
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:48
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 14:28
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 14:21
- Re: Anybody used MIMEDefang before?, Ron Johnson, 13:40
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Bart Schaefer, 13:28
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Udi Mottelo, 13:21
- Anybody used MIMEDefang before?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 13:21
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Martin McCarthy, 13:16
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, John D. Hardin, 13:13
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 13:12
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 13:07
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 13:01
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 12:56
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 12:54
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 12:19
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, David W. Tamkin, 12:15
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Udi Mottelo, 12:11
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Martin McCarthy, 11:56
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 11:51
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 11:44
- Re: Removing all headers, David W. Tamkin, 11:41
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:29
- Re: Removing all headers, Professional Software Engineering, 11:28
- Re: Removing all headers, Martin McCarthy, 11:26
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 11:21
- Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 11:14
- Re: would this work in a recipe?, Bart Schaefer, 10:53
- Removing all headers, Nils Holland, 10:47
- would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 10:05
- testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 09:50
- Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, David W. Tamkin, 09:09
- How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 07:22
May 01, 2002
- Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, John D. Hardin, 21:33
- Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Professional Software Engineering, 18:55
- 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Alan Clifford, 17:17
- Re: Lockfiles..., Nils Holland, 14:47
- Re: Lockfiles..., Martin McCarthy, 14:07
- Re: A little help with my recipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 14:00
- Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, Professional Software Engineering, 13:58
- Lockfiles..., Nils Holland, 13:24
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Alan Clifford, 13:22
- Re: A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 11:24
- Re: A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 11:20
- Re: A little help with my recipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 11:07
- A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 09:40
- A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 09:38
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, David W. Tamkin, 09:22
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 09:18
- Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, David W. Tamkin, 07:32
- Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, Justin Heimburger, 06:15
- Re: Envelope-to and ^TO, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:25
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, General P. Fault, 03:16
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 00:47
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 00:33
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 00:32
- Re: several messages, Mark, 00:11
April 30, 2002
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 23:22
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Shannon D. Denniston, 23:13
- forbidding invocation from .forward (was "several messages"), David W. Tamkin, 22:52
- Dave Massie/s&e/TWP is out of the office., Dave Massie, 22:24
- Dave Massie/s&e/TWP is out of the office., Dave Massie, 22:24
- Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:11
- How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Shannon D. Denniston, 21:02
- Re: Help with recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 20:51
- Help with recipe, Scott, 19:26
- Re: several messages, Professional Software Engineering, 18:08
- exitcode 67 question, Jeff Lacki, 18:02
- Re: several messages, Mark, 17:38