^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 2002/05/30

• Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/30
• Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 2002/05/31
• Re: ^TO_.*(abc(_at_)abc(_dot_)com|xyx(_at_)zyx) does not work ?? Why ?, S Semple, 2002/05/31

matching "p5-" w/ \<(perl5|p5-)\>, parv, 2002/05/30

• Re: matching "p5-" w/ \<(perl5|p5-)\>, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/30

mail for all.., johnathan spectre, 2002/05/30

• Re:mail for all.., Charlie Summers, 2002/05/30
• Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/30
• Message not available
  • Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/30
• Message not available
  • Re: mail for all.., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/31
• Re: mail for all.., Nancy McGough, 2002/05/31

newline, alois blasbichler, 2002/05/30

• Re: newline, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/31

Blocking e-mails with attachements, Jean-Rene Cormier, 2002/05/30

• Re: Blocking e-mails with attachements, Timothy J. Luoma, 2002/05/30
• Re: Blocking e-mails with attachements, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/30

HELP, Everaldo, 2002/05/30

• Re: HELP, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/31

Procmail & Crontab, prajakti, 2002/05/30

• Re: Procmail & Crontab, Olivier Nicole, 2002/05/30
• Re: Procmail & Crontab, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/30

Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 2002/05/29

• Re: Variables in conditions, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/29
  • Re: Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 2002/05/29
• Re: Variables in conditions, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/29
  • Re: Variables in conditions, wolfgang, 2002/05/29

IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 2002/05/29

• Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/29
  • Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 2002/05/29
    • Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/29
    • Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 2002/05/29
    • Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/30
    • Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed, Pollywog, 2002/05/30
• Re: IMAP and Procmail documentation needed - progress made, Pollywog, 2002/05/30

Blocking email with attachments, Jean-Rene Cormier, 2002/05/29

• Re: Blocking email with attachments, Ron Johnson, 2002/05/29
  • Re: Blocking email with attachments, Matt Wills, 2002/05/29
    • Re: Blocking email with attachments, Ron Johnson, 2002/05/29

multi-line matching, mlists, 2002/05/29

• Re: multi-line matching, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/29

procmail invoking sendmail, Steve Heitke, 2002/05/29

• Re: procmail invoking sendmail, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/29

How to OR conditions, Olivier Nicole, 2002/05/29

• Re: How to OR conditions, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/29
• Re: How to OR conditions, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/29

Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 2002/05/28

• Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/29
  • forward to a new email address, John Lyons, 2002/05/29
    • Re: forward to a new email address, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/29
  • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/30
    • Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/30
    • Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/30
    • Re: [procmail] Procmail log intelligibility, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/30
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/30
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/30
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 2002/05/31
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/31
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/31
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/31
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/31
    • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/31
  • Re: Procmail log intelligibility, erik, 2002/05/30

Procmail gramma problem, Marek Wysmulek, 2002/05/28

• Re: Procmail grammar problem, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/28
  • Re: Procmail grammar problem, Marek Wysmulek, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Procmail grammar problem, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Procmail grammar problem, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
• Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
  • Re: Procmail gramma problem, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Procmail gramma problem, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Procmail gramma problem, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
• Procmail gramma problem, Marek Wysmulek, 2002/05/28

Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Alonso, Claudio Fabian, 2002/05/28

• Re: Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/28
  • Re: Mails don't go to the users' mail file, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28

2 continuous lines match, Anatoly Pugachev, 2002/05/28

• Re: 2 continuous lines match, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/28
• Re: 2 continuous lines match, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/28
  • Re: 2 continuous lines match, Anatoly Pugachev, 2002/05/28

Newbie: Logging, Matt Wills, 2002/05/28

• Re: Newbie: Logging, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/28

how i can run procmail with sendmail as a LDA and how can i limit mail box size, Mujeeb, 2002/05/27

• how i can run procmail with sendmail as a LDA and how can i limit mail box size, Mujeeb, 2002/05/27

whole word recipe, S Semple, 2002/05/26

• Re: whole word recipe, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/27
• Re: whole word recipe, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/28
• Re: whole word recipe, S Semple, 2002/05/27
  • Re: whole word recipe, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/27
• Re: whole word recipe, S Semple, 2002/05/28
  • Re: whole word recipe, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/28
  • Re: whole word recipe, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
    • Re: whole word recipe, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/28
    • Re: whole word recipe, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/28
    • Re: whole word recipe, erik, 2002/05/28

Command Line Args, James Raney, 2002/05/24

• Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/27
  • Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, James Raney, 2002/05/28
    • Re: Command Line Args, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/28

How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 2002/05/24

• Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/24
  • Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/24
• Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 2002/05/24
  • Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/24
    • Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/26
• Re: How can I put more than one word in the VARIABLE ?, S Semple, 2002/05/24

Postfix + Procmail filter, Franck PAULUS, 2002/05/24

• Re: Postfix + Procmail filter, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/24
  • Re: Postfix + Procmail filter, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/27

recipe query, Troy Rasiah, 2002/05/23

• Re: recipe query, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
  • Re: recipe query, Troy Rasiah, 2002/05/23

Odd temporary file created by procmail., Hans Deragon (imap), 2002/05/23

• Re: Odd temporary file created by procmail., Santiago Vila, 2002/05/24

Catching possible Viral content, mike, 2002/05/23

• Re: Catching possible Viral content, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/23
• Re: Catching possible Viral content, John Conover, 2002/05/23
• Re: Catching possible Viral content, John D. Hardin, 2002/05/23
• Re: Catching possible Viral content, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
• Re: Catching possible Viral content, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/24

.forward and procmail, Stephen R. Wilcoxon, 2002/05/23

• Re: .forward and procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
• Re: .forward and procmail, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/23
  • Re: .forward and procmail, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/23
• Re: .forward and procmail, Fred Morris, 2002/05/23

Variable not working for two words, S Semple, 2002/05/23

• Re: Variable not working for two words, Don Hammond, 2002/05/24

spamming myself?, Timothy J. Luoma, 2002/05/23

• Re: spamming myself?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/23
  • Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/23
    • Re: spamming myself?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/24
    • Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/24
    • Re: spamming myself?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/24
    • Re: spamming myself?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/24
    • Re: spamming myself?, Don Hammond, 2002/05/25
• Re: spamming myself?, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/23
• Re: spamming myself?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/23
• Re: spamming myself?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/23

Sendmail now invokes Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 2002/05/22

• Re: Sendmail now invokes Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/22
• Re: Sendmail now invokes Procmail, ProcMailER, 2002/05/23

Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 2002/05/22

• Re: Sending emails with attachments, Mark, 2002/05/23
• Re: Sending emails with attachments, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/23
• RE: Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 2002/05/23
  • RE: Sending emails with attachments, Charlie Summers, 2002/05/23
• RE: Sending emails with attachments, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
• RE: Sending emails with attachments, Edward Wildgoose, 2002/05/24
  • Re: Sending emails with attachments, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/24

help with procmail receipe..., Richie Lai, 2002/05/22

• Re: help with procmail receipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22

Stuck Procmail processes, Monte Smith, 2002/05/22

• Re: Stuck Procmail processes, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22

Sendmail is not invoking Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 2002/05/21

• Re: Sendmail is not invoking Procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22

setting "mail from;", Bill Moseley, 2002/05/21

• Re: setting "mail from;", Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/21
• Re: setting "mail from;", Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/21
  • Re: setting "mail from;", Bill Moseley, 2002/05/22
    • Re: setting "mail from;", David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/22
    • Re: setting "mail from;", Peter Rose, 2002/05/22
    • Re: setting "mail from;", Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/22

Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Humberto Rodriguez, 2002/05/21

• Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/21
  • Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/21
    • Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/22
• Re: Sendmail is not sending message to Procmail, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/21

processing emails that bounce., Teddy Campbell, 2002/05/21

• Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/21
  • Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/21
  • Message not available
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/22
    • Message not available
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/23
    • Re: processing emails that bounce., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/23
    • Re: processing email that bounces, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/23
    • Re: processing email that bounces, Paul Thomas, 2002/05/24

procmail dead ??, sjaak nabuurs, 2002/05/20

• Re: procmail dead ??, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/21

properly process email for multiple accounts, SI Reasoning, 2002/05/19

• Re: properly process email for multiple accounts, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/20

Mozilla and Spambouncer, Peter A. J. Pilgrim, 2002/05/19

• Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/19
  • Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Peter A. J. Pilgrim, 2002/05/19
    • Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/19
    • Re: Mozilla and Spambouncer, Harold Hallikainen, 2002/05/20

I need help configuring procmail, Justin Rickert, 2002/05/19

• Re: I need help configuring procmail, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/20
• Re: I need help configuring procmail, procmail-list, 2002/05/20

grep addresses from flat file, Greg Fitzgerald, 2002/05/18

• Re: grep addresses from flat file, Paul Chvostek, 2002/05/18
  • Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Eric Hilding, 2002/05/19
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/20
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Eric Hilding, 2002/05/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/20
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 2002/05/20
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/20
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 2002/05/20
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/21
    • Re: Extraneous Lockfile & Exitcode, Aaron Schrab, 2002/05/21
  • Re: grep addresses from flat file, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/20
• Re: grep addresses from flat file, John Gianni, 2002/05/19

Little help..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/18

• Re: Little help..., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/18
• No way procmail rc file seems to live., sjaak nabuurs, 2002/05/22
  • Re: No way procmail rc file seems to live., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/22

recompile procmail for exim?, Dave Robbins, 2002/05/16

• Re: recompile procmail for exim?, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/20

Vintage Charlie...., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/16

• Re: Vintage Charlie...., Philip Guenther, 2002/05/16
  • Forging Return-Path (was: Re: Vintage Charlie....), John Hardin, 2002/05/16
    • Re: Forging Return-Path (was: Re: Vintage Charlie....), Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/16
• Re:Vintage Charlie...., Charlie Summers, 2002/05/16
  • If that's vintage Charlie, 2002 ha a fine crop., David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/16
• Re: Vintage Charlie...., Paul Thomas, 2002/05/16

FORWARDING EMAILS!!!!!!!, jonas da coll, 2002/05/16

• using procmail with Netscape Messaging, Kevin Knubel, 2002/05/19

whitelist, Chuck Charlton, 2002/05/15

• Re: whitelist, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/15
• Re: whitelist, Paul Rodger, 2002/05/15
  • Re: whitelist, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/16
    • Re: whitelist, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/16
    • Re: whitelist, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/16

Is this right?, Poohba, 2002/05/15

• Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/15
• Revised: Re: Is this right?, Poohba, 2002/05/15
  • Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/15
    • Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Poohba, 2002/05/15
    • Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/15
    • Message not available
    • Re: Revised: Re: Is this right?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/15

procmail LDA - adding >From, Jon Nathan, 2002/05/14

• procmail LDA - adding >From, Jon Nathan, 2002/05/16

^TO_ is to clever, Christian H. Kuhn, 2002/05/14

• Re: ^TO_ is too clever, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/14
• Re: ^TO_ is to clever, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/14
  • Re: ^TO_ is to clever, SI Reasoning, 2002/05/14

simple recipe, Chris LaFrance, 2002/05/13

• Re: simple recipe, erik, 2002/05/14
  • Re: [procmail] simple recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/14

formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 2002/05/13

• Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/13
  • Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/13
  • Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/13
  • Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 2002/05/14
  • Re: formail problem with leading comma in subject, Justin Heimburger, 2002/05/14

recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 2002/05/13

• Re: recipes just not working, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/13
  • Re: recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 2002/05/13
    • Re: recipes just not working, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/13
    • Re: recipes just not working, Curtis Maurand, 2002/05/14

RE: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Edward Wildgoose, 2002/05/13

• Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/13

About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Marco Fioretti, 2002/05/11

• Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/11
  • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/11
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/11
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Marco Fioretti, 2002/05/11
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/12
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/12
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, parv, 2002/05/12
    • Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/12
    • reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/12
    • Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/12
    • Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/13
    • Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/13
    • Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/13
    • Apology (was: Re: reprocessing an mbox of mail already received), Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/15
• Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Jim Bailey, 2002/05/12
• Re: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Per Sandstrom, 2002/05/12
• RE: About HTML email recipe in pm-tips, Edward Wildgoose, 2002/05/13

Changing my system mailbox, Ryan Lindsey, 2002/05/11

• Re: Changing my system mailbox, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/11

Change where Procmail as LDA delivers mail, John Oliver, 2002/05/10

• Re: Change where Procmail as LDA delivers mail, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/10

Modify To: field when forwarding email, Jean-Rene Cormier, 2002/05/10

• Re: Modify To: field when forwarding email, Giles Constant, 2002/05/10
• Re: Modify To: field when forwarding email, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/10

Filter, Monah Baki, 2002/05/10

• Re: Filter, Harry Putnam, 2002/05/10
• Re: [procmail] Filter, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/10

How do I relay from within procmail?, SI Reasoning, 2002/05/10

• Re: How do I relay from within procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
  • Message not available
    • Re: How do I relay from within procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10

Sanitizer setup question, chris, 2002/05/09

• Re: Sanitizer setup question, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09

Reversing text?, David Gibbs, 2002/05/09

• Re: Reversing text?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
  • A tip (was: Reversing text?), Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/14
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/14
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), erik, 2002/05/15
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/15
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/15
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), erik, 2002/05/15
    • Re: A tip (was: Reversing text?), Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/15
• Re: Reversing text?, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/09
  • Re: Reversing text?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/12
    • Re: Reversing text?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/12
    • Re: Reversing text?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/12

extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 2002/05/09

• Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/09
• Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
  • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 2002/05/09
  • Message not available
    • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
    • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/09
    • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 2002/05/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
    • Re: extracting RE arguments from the matching string, Giles Constant, 2002/05/10

Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/09

• Re: Stupid question about :0:, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
  • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Nancy McGough, 2002/05/09
  • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Matt Thoene, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0: (aka Coffee Logic), GreenTree Ground Station, 2002/05/09
  • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/10
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/09
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Oliver Fuchs, 2002/05/10
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
    • Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
• Re: Stupid question about :0:, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/10
  • Improve the man pages (was: Stupid question about :0:), Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/12

Filtering, Eric Bessette, 2002/05/08

• Re: Filtering, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/08
• Re: Filtering, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/08

Handling multi-line To:, Stephen Patterson, 2002/05/07

• Re: Handling multi-line To:, Don Hammond, 2002/05/07

a problem regarding procmailrc, Ali, Imran, 2002/05/07

• Re: a problem regarding procmailrc, Don Hammond, 2002/05/07

(no subject), prakash, 2002/05/07

• Re: Excessive output quenched [was: (no subject)], Don Hammond, 2002/05/08
• (No Subject), S Semple, 2002/05/22
• (no subject), alois . blasbichler, 2002/05/30

corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 2002/05/06

• Re: corrupted mboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/06
  • Re: corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 2002/05/06
    • Re: corrupted mboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/06
• Re: corrupted mboxes, Philip Guenther, 2002/05/06
  • success was: corrupted mboxes, Axel Heinrici, 2002/05/06

Using a list of known good senders, Chuck Charlton, 2002/05/06

• Re: Using a list of known good senders, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/06

sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory, Ralph SOBEK, 2002/05/06

• Re: sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/main.cf: No such file or directory, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/06

no "Lines" in mbox, Axel Heinrici, 2002/05/06

• Re: no "Lines" in mbox, Christer Borang, 2002/05/06
  • Re: no "Lines" in mbox, Axel Heinrici, 2002/05/06
  • Re: no "Lines" in mbox, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/06

Procmail Problems, zahid khan, 2002/05/04

• Re: Procmail Problems, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/05

Does this recipe look right?, Shane Williams, 2002/05/03

• Re: Does this recipe look right?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
• Re: Does this recipe look right?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
  • Re: Does this recipe look right?, Shane Williams, 2002/05/06

How to change LOG verbosity? (was: procmail flaky??), Edward Huang, 2002/05/03

• Re: How to change LOG verbosity? (was: procmail flaky??), Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/03
  • Re: How to change LOG verbosity?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/03
  • Re: How to change LOG verbosity?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/04
    • Re: How to change LOG verbosity?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/04

multi action and spamassassin, spamreg, 2002/05/03

• Re: multi action and spamassassin, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/03
  • Re: multi action and spamassassin, spamreg, 2002/05/03

complicated forward, Pavel Krijewkij, 2002/05/03

• Re: complicated forward, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/03

could this message be bypassing procmail?, hans anderson, 2002/05/03

• Re: could this message be bypassing procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/03

Anybody used MIMEDefang before?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/02

• Re: Anybody used MIMEDefang before?, Ron Johnson, 2002/05/02

Removing all headers, Nils Holland, 2002/05/02

• Re: Removing all headers, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
  • Re: Removing all headers, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
• Re: Removing all headers, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/02

would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/02

• Re: would this work in a recipe?, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/02
  • Re: would this work in a recipe?, John D. Hardin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Bart Schaefer, 2002/05/02
• Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/02
  • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/02
    • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/02
    • Re: would this work in a recipe?, John D. Hardin, 2002/05/02
  • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/02
    • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/02
• Re: would this work in a recipe?, Matt Garretson, 2002/05/06
  • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/06
  • Re: would this work in a recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/06

testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02

• Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
  • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
  • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/03
• Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/02
  • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
  • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/02
• Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/02
  • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a spatula, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, parv, 2002/05/02
    • RE: testing for existence of a file without a fork, Geoff Mulligan, 2002/05/03
    • Re: testing for existence of a file without a fork, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/03

1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/01

• Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, John D. Hardin, 2002/05/01
• Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Fabien Penso, 2002/05/03
• Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/16
  • Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/16
    • DNSBL, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 2002/05/17
    • Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/17
• Re: 1. Useless cat. 2. Counting spams, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/01

Lockfiles..., Nils Holland, 2002/05/01

• Re: Lockfiles..., Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/01
• Message not available
  • Re: Lockfiles..., Nils Holland, 2002/05/01

A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/01

• Re: A little help with my recipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/01
  • Re: A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/01
  • Re: A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/01
    • Re: A little help with my recipe..., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/01
• A little help with my recipe..., Pantelis Hadzipantelis, 2002/05/01

Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, Justin Heimburger, 2002/05/01

• Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/01
• Re: .procmailrc dir permissions, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/01

Dave Massie/s&e/TWP is out of the office., Dave Massie, 2002/04/30

• Dave Massie/s&e/TWP is out of the office., Dave Massie, 2002/04/30

How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Shannon D. Denniston, 2002/04/30

• Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/04/30
  • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Shannon D. Denniston, 2002/04/30
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/04/30
    • Message not available
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/01
    • Message not available
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/01
    • Message not available
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Andrew Edelstein, 2002/05/01
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, General P. Fault, 2002/05/01
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/01
    • Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/01
• Re: How do you set "Return-Path:" with Procmail?, Alan Clifford, 2002/05/01

Help with recipe, Scott, 2002/04/30

• Re: Help with recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/04/30
  • How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, Martin McCarthy, 2002/05/02
    • Re: How to excluding the newline in Headers scan?, David W. Tamkin, 2002/05/02
    • About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
    • Message not available
    • Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/05
    • Re: About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
    • Message not available
    • Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/05
    • Re: About the range of "h" flag., Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
    • Message not available
    • Re: About the range of "h" flag., Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/05
    • Split the folder and spread to the users, Udi Mottelo, 2002/05/05
    • Message not available
    • Re: Split the folder and spread to the users, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/05/05

Re: several messages, Mark, 2002/04/30

• Re: several messages, Professional Software Engineering, 2002/04/30
• forbidding invocation from .forward (was "several messages"), David W. Tamkin, 2002/04/30
• Re: several messages, Mark, 2002/05/01