procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stupid question about :0:

2002-05-09 11:53:51
On Thu, 09 May 2002, Professional Software Engineering wrote:

Hmm, looks like an extra colon.  I'd try 'man procmailrc', and searching 
on, of all things ':'.
If after resorting to reading the _documentation_, it remains shrouded in 
mystery, do let us know.

Hi,
o.k. I know what the docu says about this double:
        'The trailing ":" in the recipe start line ":0:" tells
        procmail to use temporary file locking to avoid writing
        simultaneously arriving potential email on top of each
        other at your "${DEFAULT}" mailbox.' 
... but I don't know what it means ... but for me both are working (:0
and :0:)

Thank you

Oliver

-- 
... don't touch the bang-bang fruit ...
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>