At 13:32 2002-05-20 -0500, Aaron Schrab did say:
Ironically, due to a long standing bug in Eudora (which has since been
duplicated in other mailers), this method probably wouldn't work for the
message to which I'm replying.
You mean your reply to my message? The following appeared nicely in the
headers of your post to the list:
In-reply-to:
<5(_dot_)1(_dot_)0(_dot_)14(_dot_)2(_dot_)20020520103843(_dot_)07724bd0(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
The following is from my previous list post which you replied to:
Message-id:
<5(_dot_)1(_dot_)0(_dot_)14(_dot_)2(_dot_)20020520103843(_dot_)07724bd0(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
Looks like a spiffy match. I did say it wasn't 100%, but let's say if you
match a message-id of a message you send with an In-reply-to or References,
you've probably got an actual message reply, not a random spew...
Notice the bogus space near the end of the In-reply-to header from the
quoted message.
I'm not talking about references within the _body_ - look to the headers.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail