On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:29:23PM -0600, Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
Dallman Ross wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 06:58:26PM -0600, Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
Also, some mailers do prepend a leading zero; so your
case of 1[4-9]|[2-9] will fail in that situation.
What do you mean here? Something like '-01100'? That
should be solved with a leading '0?' but have you
seen this in real life?
No. I mean -0600, just as in your TZ above. But forget it,
and sorry: I was confusing myself with a memory of days having
leading zeros sometimes, as in "May 09" rather than "May 9".
I give six hours for delivery. At that point in my rc, the
whitelists are over, so what's left was iffy to begin with.
I could probably tighten this up a bit too but generally I believe
MTAs have timeouts approaching 3 days. If if there are mail
interuptions I would not want to tag a pile of legit mail as spam
merely because it was a few days late.
Yes, and I suppose part of the calculus is how dependable your
ISP's mail server and uptime are. Mine are stellar, so maybe
once or twice a year there are problems leading to a few hours'
delay.
--
dman
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail