On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:49:00PM -0600, Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
Dallman Ross wrote:
They are, unfortunately, legit. See RFC2822.
Well according to an April 2001 copy I just read they are obsolete.
"Obsolete," or deprecated, yes. Illegitimate, no. There is a
difference!
Of course I just got my first false positive that had 'MDT' only :-).
Anyhow as I read it this should be the final solution (yeah right
:-):
:0 H
* !^Date.*+1300( |$)
* !^Date.*(([+-](1[12]|0?[0-9])[03]0)|([PMCEA][DS]|GM|U)T|UTC)( |$)
We have been trying to tell you: If you leave the `H' in, the
known procmail bug will come back and bite you! Later you will
have, or one day develop, a recipe with `B', and you'll wonder
why it doesn't work right and also contains the headers.
Also, I don't know why you don't keep the anchoring colon after
^Date. You might get a bad hit one day, without it, on something
like "Date-Munge-Notification:" or some such nonsense.
{
:0 H
* $ ${WEIGHT}^0
* 12^0
{ }
WEIGHT="$="
LOG="Weight adjusted for phoney timezone: $WEIGHT $NL"
Uh, it's spelled "phony."
--
dman
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail