procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

SpamAssassin Version (Re: Need feedback on this recipe.)

2003-06-22 00:30:04
On Friday, Jun 20, 2003, at 20:20 Canada/Mountain, Dragoncrest wrote:
# Mails with a score of 15 or higher are almost certainly spam (with 0.05% # false positives according to rules/STATISTICS.txt). Let's put them in a
# different mbox. (This one is optional.)

What version of SpamAssassin are you using?

# SUMMARY for threshold 5.5:
# False positives:       132  0.05%  (0.09% of nonspam,   6697 weighted)

# SUMMARY for threshold 7.0:
# False positives:        28  0.01%  (0.02% of nonspam,   1814 weighted)

# SUMMARY for threshold 8.0:
# False positives:        13  0.01%  (0.01% of nonspam,    956 weighted)

# SUMMARY for threshold 9.0:
# False positives:         5  0.00%  (0.00% of nonspam,    431 weighted)


I suspect you are quite out of date.

(BTW, running old version of spam-assassin is simply not prudent. The updated recipes and matches are CRUCIAL for maintaining a high level of accuracy. Anyone not running 2.5x at LEAST is going to be having trouble, and 2.55 is current. Me? I run 2.60cvs and trash anything with a score of 7 or higher).

--
Love seeketh not itself to please
Nor for itself hath any care
But for another gives it's ease
And builds a heaven in Hell's despair


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>