David is right - the "-k" is necessary to keep it from dropping the body of
my message.
A test on my SOLARIS system just proved that.
Don Woodward
----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier(_at_)panix(_dot_)com>
To: <procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 13:57
Subject: Re: Duplicate mail using aliases
Dallman Ross wrote:
Well, it still seems to be the explanation, just via a slightly
different angle than I was thinking. That's because
formail -k -I "X-Loop: something"
doesn't work; it errors out.
Hmm. That's a bug. Without -x, -X, or -r, -k is a no-op, so it's
harmless to specify it. Your test had no -X in it.
Without the -k, the formail stuff works fine. And without the
-I and X-Loop, it also works -- though I don't really think Don
wants the -k option to formail.
He needs it to keep -X from dropping the body.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail