Procmail (date)
October 31, 2004
- Re: Upgrading from mbox to maildir, Jeffrey Cunningham, 12:10
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Professional Software Engineering, 10:10
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:17
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:01
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Dallman Ross, 04:47
- Upgrading from mbox to maildir, Robert & Sabine von Knobloch, 02:38
October 30, 2004
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Michelle Konzack, 18:50
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Michelle Konzack, 18:39
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Professional Software Engineering, 18:22
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Gerald V. Livingston II, 16:50
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Shane Williams, 16:17
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Professional Software Engineering, 13:47
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Dallman Ross, 13:41
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 13:41
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Google Kreme, 12:30
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Google Kreme, 12:25
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Michelle Konzack, 04:57
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:30
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Michelle Konzack, 04:16
October 29, 2004
- Re: spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Google Kreme, 17:24
- spamassassin in my procmailrc fills up mail.log, Michelle Konzack, 16:52
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:10
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 12:23
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 02:10
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 01:11
October 28, 2004
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 18:28
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:43
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Volker Kuhlmann, 16:28
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 15:57
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 15:51
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 13:49
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:05
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 12:21
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 10:54
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:54
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 09:29
- Re: using procmail as LDA with postfix, Dallman Ross, 02:10
- Re: Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), Dallman Ross, 01:51
October 27, 2004
- Re: using procmail as LDA with postfix, Vince LaMonica, 20:13
- Re: using procmail as LDA with postfix, scott, 18:59
- Re: using procmail as LDA with postfix, David W. Tamkin, 17:04
- Re: using procmail as LDA with postfix, Dallman Ross, 16:43
- using procmail as LDA with postfix, scott.list, 12:31
- Using 'procmail -m ...' (question), William Park, 11:08
- Re: \/ and ${MATCH} : question, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:27
- Re: \/ and ${MATCH} : question, Udi Mottelo, 03:08
October 23, 2004
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 16:40
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Dallman Ross, 09:28
- Re: ISO something in Subject, David W. Tamkin, 08:08
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 03:07
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Per Jessen, 02:00
October 22, 2004
- Re: How to generate "Message-ID:" header ?, Michelle Konzack, 12:51
- Re: How to generate "Message-ID:" header ?, Michelle Konzack, 12:50
- Re: How to generate "Message-ID:" header ?, Dallman Ross, 12:17
- Re: How to generate "Message-ID:" header ?, David W. Tamkin, 12:16
- How to generate "Message-ID:" header ?, Michelle Konzack, 11:33
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 11:23
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 11:09
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 11:09
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 11:08
- Re: formail error 74 ??, Per Jessen, 10:30
- Re: formail error 74 ??, Dallman Ross, 10:03
- Re: formail error 74 ??, Bart Schaefer, 09:54
- Re: formail error 74 ??, Dallman Ross, 09:39
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Per Jessen, 07:16
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 07:12
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Per Jessen, 07:09
- Re: ISO something in Subject, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 06:59
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Per Jessen, 06:57
- formail error 74 ??, Per Jessen, 06:27
- ISO something in Subject, Michelle Konzack, 06:27
October 20, 2004
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, David W. Tamkin, 17:26
- Re: removing inline status?, Dallman Ross, 16:29
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Dallman Ross, 16:14
- removing inline status?, Joe Szilagyi, 16:09
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, David W. Tamkin, 16:08
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Dallman Ross, 14:36
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:19
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Jeffrey Cunningham, 09:02
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bart Schaefer, 08:55
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 06:30
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Michael J Wise, 00:39
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bart Schaefer, 00:21
October 19, 2004
- Re: /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:57
- /etc/procmailrc sets sets root ownership?, Jeffrey Cunningham, 22:25
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Patrick Shanahan, 20:17
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bart Schaefer, 19:01
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Sam, 17:31
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bart Schaefer, 15:18
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 13:56
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bart Schaefer, 13:38
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Professional Software Engineering, 13:36
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 13:18
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Patrick Shanahan, 12:52
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 12:52
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Dallman Ross, 12:46
- Re: Who is the procmail maintainer?, Bennett Todd, 11:52
- Who is the procmail maintainer?, Sam, 11:21
- Re: Filter for message that have nothing but headers?, David W. Tamkin, 09:14
- Re: Filter for message that have nothing but headers?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:11
- Re: Filter for message that have nothing but headers?, Dallman Ross, 05:01
- Filter for message that have nothing but headers?, Jim Witte, 04:23
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Dallman Ross, 02:40
October 18, 2004
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Bikrant Neupane, 23:33
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:13
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 01:32
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Bikrant Neupane, 01:23
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Professional Software Engineering, 01:20
- Re: Procmail Newbie, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 01:02
- Procmail Newbie, Bikrant Neupane, 00:19
October 15, 2004
- [OT] Spamassassin Slowness (was Re: Duplicate mail using aliases), Dallman Ross, 09:50
- Re: why is this rule not working?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:49
- [OT] Spamassassin Slowness (was Re: Duplicate mail using aliases), Justin Gombos, 09:33
- Re: why is this rule not working?, Christopher L. Barnard, 08:45
- Using /etc/mail/access for a blacklist filter, S.A. Birl, 07:31
October 14, 2004
- mail box quota, Muhammad Talha, 22:17
- Re: Help adding To: and CC: to message body, David W. Tamkin, 18:50
- RE: Help adding To: and CC: to message body, Dallman Ross, 16:21
- Re: Help adding To: and CC: to message body, Dallman Ross, 16:15
- Re: Help adding To: and CC: to message body, David W. Tamkin, 15:54
- Re: Help adding To: and CC: to message body, Dallman Ross, 15:46
- Re: Expressing metacharacters as literals, Dallman Ross, 15:40
- Help adding To: and CC: to message body, Christopher Benson, 15:04
- Re: why is this rule not working?, Justin Gombos, 14:26
- Expressing metacharacters as literals, Justin Gombos, 14:21
- Re: why is this rule not working?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:04
- why is this rule not working?, Christopher L. Barnard, 11:50
- RE: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 09:42
- Re: rewriting the subject line, David W. Tamkin, 09:07
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 04:08
October 13, 2004
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Michelle Konzack, 17:14
- Re: rewriting the subject line, David W. Tamkin, 16:30
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 15:46
- Re: SPF, Alan Clifford, 13:59
- Re: Getting a real name to trip the ^FROM_DAEMON regex, Alan Clifford, 13:53
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Michelle Konzack, 10:56
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Michelle Konzack, 10:36
- Re: SPF, csm, 10:28
- Re: SPF?, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 10:16
- Re: SPF?, Google ListKreme, 10:04
- SPF, David W. Tamkin, 10:02
- Re: Conrolling large log files, David W. Tamkin, 08:12
- Re: rewriting the subject line, David W. Tamkin, 08:12
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 05:08
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:37
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Dallman Ross, 04:36
- Re: Conrolling large log files, Michelle Konzack, 03:21
October 12, 2004
- Re: rewriting the subject line, David W. Tamkin, 23:37
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Justin Gombos, 19:45
- Getting a real name to trip the ^FROM_DAEMON regex, Justin Gombos, 19:25
- Conrolling large log files, Justin Gombos, 18:49
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dr.Ruud, 17:22
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 09:42
- SPF?, Lennart Andersen, 08:56
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:37
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 08:24
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 05:32
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:02
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 01:59
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 00:59
October 09, 2004
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 13:52
- RE: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 13:01
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 12:52
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 11:51
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, David W. Tamkin, 11:03
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (was Resolved) - still issue on LINUX but works on SOLARIS, Dallman Ross, 10:26
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (Resolved), Dallman Ross, 10:26
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 10:25
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (Resolved), Michelle Konzack, 09:08
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 09:01
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (was Resolved) - still issue on LINUX but works on SOLARIS, Don Woodward, 08:58
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (Resolved), Don Woodward, 08:24
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (Resolved), Michelle Konzack, 07:56
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, David W. Tamkin, 07:54
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases - (Resolved), Don Woodward, 06:41
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 04:05
October 08, 2004
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Don Woodward, 21:58
- (no subject), Alan Clifford, 12:43
- Re: Duplicate mail using aliases, Dallman Ross, 05:09
- Re: bouncing emails, DZ-Jay, 03:03
- Re: bouncing emails, DZ-Jay, 02:56
October 06, 2004
- Re: mailbox size limit, Shane Williams, 16:59
- Re: mailbox size limit, Raphael Mack, 14:53
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 11:09
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Curtis Maurand, 10:27
- Re: mailbox size limit, Scott Wiersdorf, 09:58
- Re: rewriting the subject line, Dallman Ross, 09:35
- rewriting the subject line, Curtis Maurand, 08:48
- Re: mailbox size limit, Patrick Shanahan, 08:28
- mailbox size limit, Raphael Mack, 08:17
October 04, 2004
- Re: Found solution to AUTORES problem- Any thoughts as to the Whys?, David W. Tamkin, 16:39
- Re: Found solution to AUTORES problem- Any thoughts as to the Whys?, Dallman Ross, 15:33
- Found solution to AUTORES problem- Any thoughts as to the Whys?, Joey Lyman, 13:47
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Michelle Konzack, 10:13
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Dallman Ross, 10:00
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Google Kreme, 07:28
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Michelle Konzack, 06:07
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Dallman Ross, 02:52
October 03, 2004
- [SOLVED] Re: Filter does not work, Michelle Konzack, 18:40
- Filter does not work, Michelle Konzack, 17:25
- Re: One rule of body only, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:40
- Re: One rule of body only, DZ-Jay, 11:01
- Re: One rule of body only, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:15
October 02, 2004
- ANN: Email Sanitizer v.1.147 is released, John D. Hardin, 13:02
- Re: One rule of body only, DZ-Jay, 09:10
- Re: Footnote with attachment, Dallman Ross, 09:01
- Re: One rule of body only, Dallman Ross, 08:08
- Re: One rule of body only, DZ-Jay, 06:09
- One rule of body only, Eriberto, 05:44
- Footnote with attachment, Eriberto, 05:40