procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Base64spam documentation

2005-09-03 09:42:55
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Gary Funck wrote:
Obviously, simply un-encoding the message body and testing against
that, would be simpler and more reliable.

As a follow-up that gets back to my original query on scoring, I notice 
that these base64 spams (and many others that sneak through spamassassin) 
inevitably address multiple panix accounts--why I don't know. Probably 
related to some sort of randomizing formula. Without scoring, isn't there 
a simple way to catch any message that has multiple and *distinct* panix 
addresses in the header. For example, multiple occurrences of 
lnp3(_at_)panix(_dot_)com would not count. Now I can do this easily enough in 
perl, 
but I am not really knowledgable about how to run a perl script from 
within procmail. Ideally, I'd like to process the message and return a 
code to procmail indicating that such a condition exists so that the 
message can be sent to /dev/null. If anybody could point me to a faq 
somewhere that dealt with running perl from within procmail, I'd 
appreciate it greatly. With perl, I feel confident that I can handle 
anything that spamassassin can't.

____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>