On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robert Holtzman <holtzm(_at_)cox(_dot_)net> [08-22-08 18:28]:
I'm not trying to be facetious but I don't recall "normal details" being
mentioned in the request. The request was for the log file....period.
What would be facetious would be to *assume* after posting about a
*particular* problem that a request for log files would be for
anything other that those applying to the *particular* problem.
In view of the fact that nothing pertaining to backup appeared in the log
I wasn't sure what to post that would apply to the *particular* problem.
How about you pointing out what part of the log I should have sent instead
of busting my ass?
It would be a very bad time to look at yourself in the mirror!
I have no problem with mirrors.
In spite of prior training which doesn't appear to have been absorbed
in a fitting manner.
In a fitting enough manner to earn me a pretty fair living for quite a few
years, pal.
--
Bob Holtzman
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price of the beer"
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail