Re: new RR type

spf-discuss

Re: new RR type

2003-10-08 10:34:03

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Meng Weng Wong wrote:

does using a new RRtype mean that nameservers everywhere must be upgraded?


AFAIK, that's the whole point behind the new UNKNOWN record type. One can make
new record types.

Paul 

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net] I wrote a spam filter in Perl, Paul Wouters new RR type, Meng Weng Wong Re: new RR type, Paul Wouters <= RE: new RR type, Arlie Davis Re: new RR type, wayne RE: new RR type, Arlie Davis RE: new RR type, Paul Wouters Re: new RR type, wayne SRV records, Meng Weng Wong Re: SRV records, Meng Weng Wong Re: SRV records, Eric S. Raymond Re: SRV records, wayne Re: SRV records, Eric S. Raymond

Previous by Date:	removing the need for wildcards, Meng Weng Wong
Next by Date:	Re: Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net] I wrote a spam filter in Perl, wayne
Previous by Thread:	new RR type, Meng Weng Wong
Next by Thread:	RE: new RR type, Arlie Davis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]