On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Arlie Davis wrote:
|
| Basically, SRV with the "service name" field = SPF obviates the need for
| fake subdomains like _smtp_client. We went through all this hell with
| HTTP and the stupid www. convention, just because we didn't have the SRV
| record when HTTP hit.
|
could you mock up some example records in BIND format so we all know
what they might look like? i posted a couple of examples in my RFC
excerpt; perhaps you could do one that combined multiple mechanisms, eg
a, mx, and ptr.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡