spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SRV records

2003-10-16 13:45:17
Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:10:03PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:36:32PM -0400, Arlie Davis wrote:
| | 
| | Basically, SRV with the "service name" field = SPF obviates the need for
| | fake subdomains like _smtp_client.  We went through all this hell with
| | HTTP and the stupid www. convention, just because we didn't have the SRV
| | record when HTTP hit.
| | 
| 

I'd still like to see some examples of SRV or other records

If this is a plan to lift SPF policy attributes out of the TXT field,
I'm in favor of it.  That is my only technical objection to the existing 
design.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡