wayne wrote:
In <20031015050130(_dot_)GY2345(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng
Wong
<mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:
And we need some good publicity soon.
I think we need a good spec and some good code and publicity will take
care of itself. I think the SPF website is far more important than an
RFC number.
Agreed, however both should be worked on. By having a fully
implementable solution available via the website, you will immediately
get a fair number of implementations after another Slashdot post I'm
sure. That's how I found the project, and had there been a
patch/replacement for qmail-smtp, I would have gone through with an
implementation immediately. The only thing that held me back was that I
could not actually get my MTA to check SPF records yet, and I'm not
/that/ great of a programmer to implement it myself. I saw patches for
postfix and sendmail mentioned, has anyone focused on qmail at all?
---
Dustin D. Trammell
Vulnerability Remediation Alchemist
Citadel Security Software, Inc.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com