spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: extending the macro syntax

2003-11-03 19:59:29


Meng Weng Wong wrote:

i would like to make the { } optional when the %xx matches \b%xx\b, do
you think that's a good idea?  so you can say ptr:%d2.  reversal
notation would still need the { } of course.


I have the { } optional for the single letter case (as used in the exp= case). Thus you can say %d or %{d}. The %{d2} has to use the braces.

I'm nervous about making too many things optional as they probably don't get tested well! Also, stuff that is easy to do in perl is often much trickier in other languages!

Philip

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>