spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.

2004-10-05 09:11:48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Meng Weng Wong" <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>
| To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
| Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:31 PM
| Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Why I think we should tolerate
compatibility with
| PRA.
|
|
|
|>On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:56:24PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
|>| part of, Microsoft has proven to be just as implacable.  You are
|>| certainly more intelligent than George Bush and probably brighter than
|>| Winston Churchill.  What's taking you so long?
|>
|>George Bush and Winston Churchill had armies.
|
|
| But we have all the good folksongs!
|
| ("Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, Spam! Spam!, wonderful
| spam, spam, spam, spam...")

Oh! Emanual Kant was a real P**s-ant who was very rarely stable,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBYsfDa44x14FCa6ARAnKgAJ9hTylGjRxc9qJI0iyvMf29eUVS8QCfaAGX
8MVbz6h9NdxkULfXqeBDcJM=
=TqB4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----