spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.

2004-10-04 19:26:39
Has anyone done a grid or concise analysis of SES vs SRS?  I have seen god 
arguments pro and con of
both, and I wonder if someone has put anything together?

Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Fax: (416) 441-9085


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Meng 
Weng Wong
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:12 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Why I think we should tolerate
compatibility
with PRA.


On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:01:06PM -0500, wayne wrote:
|
| Really, what more do you want to see happen with SPF-classic?
|

I'd like to see more MTAs distributed with SRS built in and
ready to go.

A lot of "todo" remains:

  http://www.libsrs2.org/status.html

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in
Atlanta features SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily
deactivate your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>