spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why I think we should tolerate compatibility with PRA.

2004-10-04 12:00:32
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric S. Raymond wrote:
| Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>:
|
|>On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
|>| Winston churchill in 1938, in response to Chamberlain's appeasement
said:
|>| "we seem to be very near the bleak choice between War and Shame. My
feeling
|>| is that we shall choose Shame, and then have War thrown in a little
later,
|>| on even more adverse terms than at present."
|>
|>OK, I'd like to collect more opinions on this thread today
|>and then reformulate my position at the end of the day.
|
|
| Meng, I've thought about it a lot and decided I have to side with the
| anti-M$ers on this one.  You tried to play nice and unify everybody;
| that was good, and I'm glad you tried.  But there does come a point at
| which we have to recognize that further attempts to play nice are just
| empowering an implacable and vicious enemy.
|
| Churchill noticed that with respect to the Nazis in 1938.  George W.
| Bush figured it out with respect to Islamic terrorism in 2002.  Within
| the context of the (thankfully) much less lethal struggle that SPF is
| part of, Microsoft has proven to be just as implacable.  You are
| certainly more intelligent than George Bush and probably brighter than
| Winston Churchill.  What's taking you so long?

Woops... ^^^^^^^^^^ that pretty much ends the thread! ;-)

- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBYZ3QZfy0juH51WsRAkrZAJ9fziD1bLzRfEWtHGvdPWV6OWihrACaAjAl
cJgdM+PHP+j21UTn0DopD8A=
=tkki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>