Mark Lentczner wrote:
Unless I hear gnashing of teeth
It's purrrfect. Three minor points: You haven't added the
two "common mistakes" reported by Meng e.a. ("a" used with
IP, "include" used with non-existent sender policy).
If you want even more justification for the new RR type,
you could add a pointer to the new (yesterday) IAB I-D
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-dns-choices-00.txt
Bye, Frank