Re: Re: When did we lose control?

On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 11:47, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> James Couzens wrote:
>
> > Why the hell are we even considering talking with them further. 
>
> Because a standard used by 2% of the population is no standard.
You miss my point.  They are _HINDERING_ development.  They have an
_AGENDA_ which it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what
motivates that agenda.

And please don't overlook the fact that they are horrible programmers,
their "quality assurance" department appears to be about as useful to
its customers as a TV is to a blind man.

So they lie, they cheat, they steal, they push, they take, they hide,
they lay ruin.  The only consistent thing here is that they continually
do this!  Each release of windows is worse!  More bugs!  More code! 
More money!  

Excuse me, but where is the positive here?

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
                                                     ( ( (      
      ((__))         __\|/__        __|-|__        '. ___ .'    
       (00)           (o o)          (0~0)        '  (> <) '    
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features 
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part