spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: purely dual-format approach

2004-10-30 05:10:08
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Roger Moser wrote:

v=spf1 sc=mfrom,pra a mx 
       sc=mfrom exists:%{l}._ses.example.com -all

That would be a new kind of positional modifier, not the
variant documented in SPF protocol-03.  

Have you read new SenderID spec? If not let me quote something from it:

"3. SPF Records
   Domains declare which hosts are and are not authorized to transmit email 
   messages on their behalf by publishing SPF records as defined in [SPF]. 
   Sender ID  employs SPF records, as described below, in order to determine
   if a specific email message has been received from an authorized host.

   Sender ID modifies the definition of SPF records as described in the 
   following sub-sections.

 3.1 Positional Modifiers
   This section replaces section 4.6.3 of [SPF] and adds the concept of 
   positional modifiers."

See http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid_downloads.mspx
and download the senerid_spec1.pdf

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>