Re: purely dual-format approach

Chris Haynes wrote:

> "op=pra,smm"
So far it's almost the same as p=pra,etc

> "op=any"
But that won't work with p=.  Is op=any really a good idea ?

With p= you can have any predicate, e.g. hardpass or dk or
whatever makes sense.  But op=any is like setting all bits
in a bitfield where most bits are not yet defined.  op=any
also doesn't allow mutually exclusive properties / options.

                   Bye, Frank