spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: purely dual-format approach

2004-10-31 08:08:52
These questions are still up for the taking, btw.

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:31:30AM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:02:56AM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
| | 
| | OK, let's run a thought experiment so we can think this
| | through.
| | 
| | Suppose we renegotiate and the agreement is that MS PRA stuff
| | will not use v=spf1 records for PRA scope checking.  MS will
| | tell people to publish spf2.0/pra, and the SPF community
| | will tell people to publish v=spf1.
| | 
| | What will senders do?
| | 
| 
| "Senders" can be broken down into multiple segment, so for
| the sake of clarity I will list some of the main ones.
| 
| 1) ESPC
| 
| 2) ISPs
| 
| 3) folks in the SPF community who know the difference
|    between PRA and mail-from
| 
| 3) enterprises and domain owners who don't know the
|    difference between PRA and mail-from
| 
| What do you think each segment will do?
| 
| Assume MS has a wizard that asks all the same questions that
| the SPF wizards ask, but spit out results with an spf2.0/pra
| prefix.
|