On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:23:28PM -0400, Michael Hammer wrote:
|
| It would appear to me that the outcome you negotiated with MS is to
| place the onus on the publisher of the SPF1 record to work around the
| failures of SenderID/PRA implementation to DTRT.
OK, let's run a thought experiment so we can think this
through.
Suppose we renegotiate and the agreement is that MS PRA stuff
will not use v=spf1 records for PRA scope checking. MS will
tell people to publish spf2.0/pra, and the SPF community
will tell people to publish v=spf1.
What will senders do?