RE: Ignoring rejected mail?

Mark wrote:

> Well, there you have it. :) I mean, if you want to do SES checks, then
> someone, somewhere, will have to implement those checks. In your case,
> without the cooperation of at least the end-MTA, no authentication check
> takes place at all.
I am doing SES so that forwarded mails are not rejected due to SPF. So the
only thing I require is: Either don't check SPF or check it correctly. That
is pretty equivalent to not requiring any cooperation.

Roger