-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Roger
Moser
Sent: woensdag 8 december 2004 16:54
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] Ignoring rejected mail?
Mark wrote:
Then you require at least the cooperation of the end-MTA.
I am using SES since months and I don't require the
cooperation of anyone, neither forwarders nor receivers.
The only requirement is that if an MTA implements SPF,
it correctly processes the 'exists' mechanism.
Well, there you have it. :) I mean, if you want to do SES checks, then
someone, somewhere, will have to implement those checks. In your case,
without the cooperation of at least the end-MTA, no authentication check
takes place at all.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx