RE: Ignoring rejected mail?

spf-discuss

RE: Ignoring rejected mail?

2004-12-08 08:52:00

Mark wrote:

Then you require at least the cooperation of the end-MTA.


I am using SES since months and I don't require the cooperation of anyone,
neither forwarders nor receivers. The only requirement is that if an MTA
implements SPF, it correctly processes the 'exists' mechanism.

Roger

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, (continued) RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, william(at)elan.net Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, william(at)elan.net Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Roger Moser <= RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Roger Moser Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Frank Ellermann RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark

Previous by Date:	Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne
Next by Date:	Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Stephane Bortzmeyer
Previous by Thread:	RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark
Next by Thread:	RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]