spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID

2004-12-14 13:51:45
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Frank 
Ellermann
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:21 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Cc: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID


Scott Kitterman wrote in spf-discuss:

| John Levine, chairman of the Anti-Spam Research Group (ASRG) notes that
| "Despite occasional comments to the contrary, no one has
actually tried out
| SPF or Sender ID or anything else.  And since the e-mail system
is so large,
| you've really got to try it out to see where it breaks and how
hard it is to
| fix the breaks and how much damage it causes." (1)

| References:
| (1) "IETF Shutters E-Mail Working Group," by Jim Wagner, Internetnews.com
| September 22, 2004.

Strange, why should John want to lie in an interview ?  I'll
forward this question to the ASRG mailing list, SPF was used
before the weird "Sender ID" was "invented", we all know this.

                        Bye, Frank


It may just be that he was misquoted or quoted out of context.  That does
happen now and then.

Scott Kitterman