----- Original Message -----
From: "Meng Weng Wong" <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Wildcat! SPF Support
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:17:25AM -0500,
terry(_at_)ashtonwoodshomes(_dot_)com
wrote:
|
| There are pages that refer to the various implementations of SPF for the
various MTA's. That's
| where this belongs. SPF in wildcat is not a protocol, it is an
implementation of SPF. Perhaps on
| spf.idimo.com you should start a section of "MTA's that support SPF",
that's where it would really
| belong.
|
|
that would be great, if someone did that, spf.pobox.com
could link to it.
I have updated the downloads page, but if we're going to
start listing MTAs, we need to be comprehensive.
Thanks for adding this.
But other than the obvious, software wise, what is the difference between
Wildcat! SMTP Mail Server and MS Exchange?
I mean, what is a MTA?
In fact, you are technically incorrect by saying MTA because that means the
"sender component" of a SMTP server is SPF compliant. No. If you want to
be specific, it is a list of MDAs (the receiver) that is important in this
case.
But why confuse people? I would suggest to Just note down the supportive
SMTP servers/product names. Simple.
Sure, when it comes down to maybe SUBMITTER or SRS, then it becomes
important to maybe indicate MTA as the router/sender part of the server that
supports new routing protocols on the outbound side.
Understand?
In any case, thanks for the consideration.
Sincerely,
Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
305-431-2846 Cell
305-248-3204 Office